HEATED DEBATE with Atheists: Is the First Premiss of the Kalam Based on a Fallacy? EXPLICIT CONTENT

BEST WAY TO SUPPORT MY WORK HERE: https://gofund.me/6d12e691

In this video, I discuss with Atheists why the first premiss of the kalam cosmological argument is not a fallacy of composition. The discussion was initially prompted by the video posted at the link below in which an Atheist in a previous discussion claimed that this was a fallacy. Some of the Atheists seem not to understand the difference between inductive reasoning and composition fallacies. Please forgive the explicit language by some of the Atheists in the video.